10/13/09

2011 Porsche Cayenne Hybrid: First Drive


Cayennehybrid

By Thom Blackett for Cars.com

For most every task in life, there are at least two methods of approach. Ask Donald Trump to build you a new home, for example, and the result will be something drastically different than what you’d get from one of Habitat for Humanity’s volunteer squads. Not necessarily better, but different, and designed for clients on opposite ends of the spectrum. The same holds true in regards to hybrid vehicles, a fact documented by the $19,800 Honda Insight and $106,035 Lexus LS 600h L.

The 2011 Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid would also fall in that latter category. Just like the original Cayenne SUV stirred the ire of Porsche purists, the development of a questionably eco-friendly SUV might shake things up again. We’ve driven it, and have some specifications that should help quell fears.

Classified as a full hybrid, the 2011 Cayenne S Hybrid uses the same supercharged V-6 engine as the 2010 Audi S4, but it’s paired with a 38-kilowatt electric motor, a nickel-metal-hydride battery located under the cargo floor (with no corresponding loss in cargo volume) and an eight-speed automatic transmission. Put it all together and you have a powertrain boasting 374 horsepower, 406 pounds-feet of torque, a tow rating comparable to other Cayenne models, and a zero to 60 mph time of about 6.5 seconds. Oh, and fuel economy that Porsche suggests will reach a combined 27 mpg. By comparison, the V-8-powered Cayenne S delivers slightly more horsepower but much less torque and a combined fuel economy of 15 mpg.

Cayennehybridchart

As luck would have it, Porsche invited us to experience this supercharged hybrid during a brief drive around some swanky parts of Los Angeles. The surplus of torque made for quick, easy acceleration, and thankfully, this particular hybrid didn’t actually feel like a hybrid. Most hybrids use continuously variable automatic transmissions that are sometimes slow to react as you nail the gas pedal at a green light; the Cayenne’s eight-speed gearbox gets things moving quickly without all of the CVT’s linear-revving fuss.

Another hybrid annoyance — regenerative brakes that cause a dragging sensation every time you lift off the accelerator and press the left pedal — has been fine-tuned. You don’t feel all of the hybrid components working, but you can keep apprised of what’s going on by checking out displays in the gauge cluster and instrument panel.

Cayennint500

In terms of driving feel, a new electrohydraulic power-steering system actually delivers better feedback in the hybrid than the traditional unit found in the Cayenne Diesel we also tested on the same route. Our loop didn’t allow us to test Porsche’s claims of traveling up to 32 mph on electric power alone or coasting up to 86 mph without any assistance from the gas engine.

Porsche expects the S Hybrid to comprise about 5 percent to 10 percent of all Cayenne sales when it goes on sale in 2010. Pricing has not been announced, but expect the Hybrid to slot above the $60,000 Cayenne S. Finally, company officials have confirmed that the Cayenne S Hybrid’s technology will also power an upcoming Porsche Panamera Hybrid model.

After our brief encounter, we’re not sure the world really needs a hybrid Porsche SUV, especially given the availability of rides like the diesel-powered BMW X5. Then again, we didn’t think there was much need for a Porsche SUV to begin with, and sales figures have clearly proven us wrong.

Specifications

  • Base Price: Estimated to be in excess of $60,000
  • Engine: Supercharged 3.0-liter V-6 paired with a 38-kilowatt electric motor and nickel-metal-hydride battery
  • Horsepower: 374 hp
  • Torque: 406 lbs.-ft.
  • Transmission: Eight-speed automatic
  • Fuel Economy: 27 mpg combined (Porsche estimate)
  • 0-60 mph: 6.5 seconds (Porsche estimate)
  • Top Speed: 149 mph (Porsche estimate)
  • Competitors: BMW X5 xDrive35d, Cadillac Escalade Hybrid, Lexus RX 450h, Volkswagen Touareg 2 TDI

10/12/09

2010 Honda Insight: She Said, She Said


Insight1

The new Honda Insight has gotten a lot of negative buzz lately despite being a capable hybrid. Part of the problem is comparisons to the Toyota Prius. Here are two more voices weighing in on the little hybrid from Honda and whether or not it holds up to life in the big city.

Beth: The best way to describe the Honda Insight’s looks is to say it’s a mini-Prius, which is also a pretty apt description of the car itself. It’s like the Prius, just less so — less efficient, less refined, less money (it costs about $2,000 less than Toyota’s signature hybrid). I averaged about 44 mpg in my time with the Insight, which is certainly nothing to sneeze at, but it felt hard-earned to me.

Insight3

Amanda: The acceleration was a bit sluggish and the interior was pretty stripped down, but if your primary interest when buying a new car is to find one that gets incredible gas mileage, then I’d say the Insight fits the bill. And whether it’s in the Insight or the Prius, I just can’t get used to the split rear window — I always feel like I’m missing a big chunk of road right behind me.

Beth: Visibility was definitely one of the Insight’s major drawbacks. The split rear view is obnoxious, and something about the placement of the B-pillar and the position of my seat made checking my blind spot a lot more difficult than it needed to be. The bigger deal to me, though, was how long it took to get going again once I’d stopped. I’m obviously talking about less than a second here, but those moments seem quite long when you’re turning left in front of traffic. I found myself rethinking my timing on those turns rather quickly after getting behind the wheel of the Insight. I had no such hesitation in the Prius.

Insightinterior

Amanda: I think I was primarily disappointed by some of the interior features. For all the indicator lights and special screens you could scroll through to get information on your mileage and hybrid function, I thought a tiny bit more could’ve gone into a few select bells and whistles. I wasn’t looking for luxurious leather interior or seat warmers or anything, but a backup camera (especially given the limited view out the back) would’ve been nice.

Beth: Definitely. And as much as I love the USB input, the system was painstakingly slow to switch between playlists or other menus when I plugged in my iPod. That said, the cargo space felt plentiful for such a small car, and other than the hesitation when accelerating from a stop, the driving experience really wasn’t bad. At the end of the day, if you’re looking to save gas, this is still one of the best choices out there; I’d just have a hard time recommending it over a Prius. If you’re set on a hybrid and the drop-dead MSRP your budget will allow is $19,800, I don’t think you’d regret buying an Insight. If you can manage to stretch things just a bit further, though, a new Prius would probably be worth the effort.

Insighttrunk

2010 GMC Terrain: First Drive

Terrain1

Yesterday, we took our first spin in a few versions of the 2010 GMC Terrain five-seat crossover, which goes on sale this week. The Terrain is GMC's version of the Chevrolet Equinox. General Motors gets a little twitchy if you point out that one model is a version of another. No one wants to pay a premium for a model "based on" one from a more modest brand, right? It's a reasonable argument, but the economic reality of auto manufacturing in 2009 requires all companies to do more platform- and parts-sharing than ever, and when it's done properly, there's really nothing wrong with it.

Two things should make GM and potential buyers more comfortable about the fact that this GMC is related to a Chevy: First, its sibling is the Equinox, which in its 2010 redesigned form is a strong contender in the world of compact SUVs. Second, there's a lot to distinguish the Terrain from its sibling where it counts most: on the outside, where only the windshield and the roof are shared.

All of the things that make the Equinox attractive are here, not the least of which is its EPA-estimated 32 mpg highway when equipped with the four-cylinder. It has a comfortable ride, and it handles reasonably well for its type. I rode in the backseat with a driver who measures a towering 6 feet 6 inches tall, and he had a bit of headroom to spare even with an optional moonroof, a feature that tends to rob at least a little interior space.
Terrainlegroom

Thanks to a rear bench seat that slides back, I had a few inches of knee clearance, even with the front seat moved fully rearward. I'm a mere 6 feet tall, and my knees were raised a few inches higher than the bottom cushion level, so my thighs weren't fully supported. The 60/40-split backrest angle adjusts to three positions, the rear two of which are comfortable. You'd best adjust it from outside of the car because the release handle is atop the backrest and not easily reached once seated. It felt to me that the head restraint should be inched up a bit, but despite its use of real posts, the Terrain's didn't move.

Overall, I found the backseat ride quality more than livable with 18-inch wheels on some rough roads. Seventeen-inchers are standard, and 19-inchers are optional on higher trim levels. GMC says it hasn't given the Terrain different suspension tuning or steering calibration than the Equinox has, and it's a smart move. Too often a manufacturer thinks it has to vary suspension tuning to distinguish its brands. When you make things different just to make them different, you run the risk of making one or the other inferior — maybe even both.

Terrain's SLE and SLT trim levels — subdivided into 1 and 2 versions — come with your choice of four-cylinder or V-6 engine and front- or all-wheel drive. Coupled with all-wheel drive and hauling a few people, the four-cylinder was adequate, though it was clearly working harder. The V-6 obviously brings more power, but it's in a stealthy manner: The electronic throttle and transmission schedule are so conservative that the Terrain ambles off the line and upshifts promptly. The power's there when you kick it, but the acceleration is oddly similar between the two.

Terrainrear

The best reason to choose one of these trucks over the other is aesthetics. The interiors are a little different in design but equally high in quality. The cloth-upholstered model I checked out had nice-looking fabric, though I'm not sold on the industry's move toward rough textures. As for the exterior, most of us were unimpressed with the styling at the Terrain's auto-show introduction. Although it looks a little better out in the wild in a variety of colors, it still doesn't ring my bell. It looks tougher than the Equinox, mainly because of a huge grille and Hummer H3-style fender flares — complete with gaping space above the wheels. From the rear, the Terrain has the misfortune of resembling the Honda Odyssey and Toyota Sienna, which wouldn't be a bad thing if they weren't minivans. That's just my opinion, which is worth no more than yours. You like, you buy.
Terraininterior

So what justifies the $24,250 Terrain's base-price premium over the $22,440 Equinox? Simply, its standard equipment list, which contains roughly 10 more of the features found optional on the Chevy, including a backup camera (displayed in the rearview mirror if you forego the navigation system offered on most trim levels). The higher you climb on the trim-level ladder, the closer these two models get in features and price. When packed to the gills with features, the Equinox actually costs more — $37,735 — than the Terrain at $37,080, both including a destination charge.

We're often asked if the GMC division should exist, and it's a legitimate question. It's a profitable brand — something GM needs — and the company claims it attracts a significant percentage of buyers who don't cross-shop Chevys. Regardless of your feelings about one brand or the other, keeping the most impressive aspects consistent and significantly distinguishing the aesthetic character seems the right way to share platforms.

More 2010 GMC Terrain Images

More 2010 GMC Terrain Images

Terraincolors

Terrainprofile

Terraincargo

Terraincloth

Terraincamera

Terraingauges

Source: cars.com

2010 Honda Accord Crosstour: First Look

Hondacrosstour1

  • Competes with: Toyota Venza, Subaru Outback, Nissan Murano
  • Looks like: Acura’s penchant for ugly grilles has infected Honda
  • Drivetrain: Likely the same 3.5-liter V-6 as the Accord sedan
  • Hits dealerships: Fall 2009

We knew Honda was bringing a new crossover — based on the Accord — to market relatively soon. The company even teased an up-close image of its grille. Today, we get to see the full monty, and it could have stood some shrinkage.

There’s just no discussing this car without tackling its huge schnoz. Not only is it oddly shaped, but it doesn’t fit the natural flow of the car’s front end. Follow the lines of the headlights and notice how they smash right into the grille. It’s disjointed to say the least and unfortunate in an extreme sense since the rest of the car looks fairly decent. We have images of the Crosstour grille and the standard Accord sedan grille below.

Full specs haven’t been revealed yet. A special web page for the Crosstour hints at more in 34 days; we’re not sure if that’s for more information or the on-sale date. Honda is known for putting an all-new model on sale the same day they release full details to the press, and it’s possible that the Crosstour will go on sale on Oct. 2.

How else does it differ from a typical Accord sedan? Honda says it will ride higher, like an SUV, to give a commanding view of the road. Obviously, the rear hatch will offer more utility than a sedan trunk; Honda calls it a “unique” cargo area, but doesn’t offer any specific details about it.

If you want to follow the Crosstour on Facebook, maybe you’ll learn more along the way. Check out the new page here. For the rear — and much better-looking — angle of the Crosstour, click below.

Hondacrosstour2

Hondacrosstour1
Hondaaccordsedan

Source: cars.com

10/11/09

2009 Subaru Tribeca Limited, an AutoWeek Drivers Log

2009 Subaru Tribeca Limited

EXECUTIVE EDITOR WES RAYNAL: After the Tribeca's 2008 restyle, it looks like it comes from Chrysler, which is a huge improvement over the old one that was Pontiac Aztekian in its ugliness.

The Tribeca drives well. It's quiet and it feels much lighter than its 4,250 pounds. That's nearly 1,000 pounds less than General Motors' crossovers and the Subaru is a more fun, more flingable ride as a result.

The power is decent and the transmission is mated well to this engine. For the most part, the interior is good though a few materials could use an upgrade for the price.

That price is quite ambitious, and I'm trying to be nice here. GM's crossovers start at roughly the same price, and the Toyota 4Runner, the Honda Pilot, the Hyundai Veracruz, the Jeep Commander, the Mazda CX-9, and the Toyota Highlander all start at less.

SENIOR EDITOR FOR NEWS BOB GRITZINGER: I agree that the styling redo helped the Tribeca immensely--it's not quite the odd duck it used to be--but there are still some things that just seem out of proportion. For me, it starts with the steering wheel, which seems oddly undersized for the task at hand. It works fine, but just seems like it ought to be larger in diameter and beefier to go along with the bigger SUV. That may also contribute to the steering feel, which isn't terribly linear at some speeds, but seems kind of clunky.

I also think this is pricey, but that may be tainted by the value Subaru seems to represent in its other models. I'm just not sure Subie needs to play in this segment; rather, it should focus on the great smaller stuff it does best.

MANAGING EDITOR ROGER HART: The Tribeca does seem an odd vehicle choice for Subaru. While I think most of Subie's offerings are of good value, especially the new Forester, I'm not sure I'd agree here. Yes, it has a third row, but the second and third rows are nearly useless for adults. There just isn't that much room in the thing. That's why the Tribeca weighs 1,000 pounds less than the GM crossovers--because it's smaller.

I like the engine but the transmission was having some issues finding the right gear. It would hold a gear a long time before deciding to upshift, and a couple of times, it hesitated on downshifts when I needed to pass.

Another annoyance was the steering wheel. It's too small for such a vehicle (but I just came out of the 300C SRT8 and that has a BIG wheel) and there is no telescoping column, so I couldn't get into a comfortable driving position. With the seat, which was supportive and comfortable, in the right position for my legs, the wheel was too close to the dash.

Yes, this edition of the Tribeca looks better than the old one. But all things considered, I'd take the Forester in the hopes that I didn't need to haul six little kids around.

MOTORSPORTS EDITOR MAC MORRISON: I'm in the minority, clearly, but I never minded the Tribeca's looks, including the original with its gaping snout of a front grille. So I certainly don't have a problem with the improved redesign.

I do have a problem with the nontelescoping steering wheel, which made it difficult for me to find an ideal seating position. I did not have a problem with the wheel's actual size, however.

The interior design is nice, especially the wraparound center stack on the dash. The Tribeca offers a smooth and comfortable ride, and the drivetrain provides performance on par with others in this class. But the lack of room compared with some of its competitors is difficult to look past. For my money, I may as well simply buy a Forester.

2009 Subaru Tribeca Limited

In Fleet: Jan. 19-Feb. 6

As-Tested Price: $37,081

Drivetrain: 3.6-liter H6; AWD, five-speed automatic

Output: 256 hp @ 6,000 rpm, 247 lb-ft @ 4,400 rpm

Curb Weight: 4,250 lb

Fuel Economy: (EPA/AW) 18/17.1 mpg

Options: Convenience group including puddle lights, rear dome/reading lights ($314); floor mats ($60); cargo net ($47)


Source: http://www.autoweek.com/article/20091002/CARREVIEWS/910029998#ixzz0TiR70zBK

10/10/09

2011 Hyundai Sonata's Radical New Look


2011sonata

Today, Hyundai released two sketches of the next-generation Sonata midsize sedan. Orders are already being taken in Korea ahead of its official launch there on Sept. 10; the Sonata won’t hit the U.S. until 2010 as a 2011 model.

We expect to learn and see a lot more of the Sonata next week, but we do know that the Korean version will have a six-speed automatic transmission and 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine. The current Sonata has a 2.4-liter four-cylinder with a five-speed automatic transmission returning 22/32 mpg city/highway. This new engine looks to be more efficient. Electronic stability control will be standard across the line.

Other features and options include a panoramic sunroof, steering-wheel-mounted shift paddles and a push-button ignition.

The fastback look in these images seems a wild departure for the typically sedate Hyundai. One more image is below.

2011sonata2

Source: cars.com

1,600 MX-5s mark roadster’s 20th in Japan

Miatas

To celebrate the 20th anniversary of its MX-5 (nee Miata) roadster, Mazda recently hosted a special commemorative event at its Miyoshi Proving Ground in western Japan that drew 1,600 cars.

The Hiroshima-based automaker said some 2,600 owners and fans journeyed from all over Japan and overseas to join the celebration. The event was officially launched with a toast from a 20-year-old roadster owner, who was born the same year as the iconic MX-5 was first launched.

During the event, owners got to speak with the MX-5’s development team, there were congratulatory speeches and guests were invited to take part in a roadster quiz. Mazda’s director and senior managing executive officer in charge of vehicle development, Seita Kanai, promised in his speech that “The Roadster is forever!” which got the crowd cheering.

To end the event, all 1,600 MX-5s paraded around the banked test track at the Miyoshi Proving Ground.
Source: www.carguidecanada.ca

2009 Audi TTS Roadster, an AutoWeek Drivers Log

2009 Audi TTS

MOTORSPORTS EDITOR MAC MORRISON: After several days behind the wheel of this TTS, I've come to appreciate its fine style and performance. This roadster draws a never-ending cascade of compliments. No doubt the white paint and 19-inch wheels draw attention, and for good reason: this is an elegant design, enhanced by the S-specific side sills and front splitter, plus bigger front intakes and R8-like LED headlights. And though I almost always prefer a coupe's lines to a convertible's, the new TT design lends itself well to the ragtop. The roadster features far more rear-deck area than the coupe, and the look works well here and gives the TT a little bit of its old identity back, versus the coupe's common fastback shape.

I did not notice any cowl shake or chassis flex; Audi has done a good job to produce a solid chassis. I spent a fair amount of time with the top down, even though the temperature hovered around 50 degrees. With the rear wind deflector in place, side windows up and the heat cranked, I was more than comfortable. And the electronically raised and lowered rear wind deflector is a welcome solution. Simply push a button and the screen moves up and down in about two seconds. Very slick.

Performance-wise, the car is fun to drive, with Audi's now ubiquitous DSC transmission cracking-off upshifts and downshifts with nary a hiccup. The engine is strong, with a hint of detectable turbo whine and a satisfying boom from the exhaust with each upshift under hard acceleration. However, you never forget that you are driving a four-cylinder, no matter how high-tech this upgraded engine is, but this is probably the best solution in terms of fitting the TT's intended character and manners. The car is not on the same level as a Porsche Boxster or a BMW Z4 in terms of organic driving experiences, but it's a reasonable alternative for those who desire to find an even blend of style, comfort, build quality and performance.

Side note: Dump the options, though, because this as-tested price is ludicrous. And while we all hope Audi winds up bringing the TTRS to our roads, I'm afraid to think about how expensive it might be. Please, Audi, don't let the price tag creep up into the Porsche zone.

EDITORIAL ASSISTANT JONATHAN WONG: This TTS is proof that there is room to run with Volkswagen/Audi's 2.0-liter turbocharged I4. With the same displacement, they've squeezed an additional 65-hp and 51 lb-ft of torque out of this powerplant. Impressive, but they've done a lot to separate this engine from its base configuration.

For starters, they strengthen the block, heads, pistons, con rods and upgrade the turbocharger and intercooler. Then they added a reworked intake and exhaust system to deliver the jump in grunt. The more powerful engine delivers power smoothly when partnered with the DSG gearbox. Rattle off upshifts and downshifts yourself with the paddles or slot the shifter into Sport mode and let the computer do the work; it doesn't matter because this dual-clutch works beautifully either way. Before you know it, you're well past 60 mph and the car still doesn't want to letup. Good engine.

The tighter suspension provides gobs of grip, quick turn-in and a confident ride. Like Mac, I found the chassis solid even without the fixed roof. Only thing I was looking for is a little more weight in the steering wheel, which is my complaint about most Audi vehicles.

Its more aggressive appearance is fitting to go along with the TTS's raised performance game. Larger intakes upfront, new headlights, side sills and various exterior trim bits look good.

Basically, the TTS is what driving enthusiasts have been asking for. More power, snappier handling and more standout looks. No, it doesn't give drivers the sense of involvement that you have in a Boxster, but it strikes a good balance of performance and luxury. Maybe the TTRS they announced for Europe would be the answer for more thoroughbred performance folks?

SENIOR EDITOR FOR NEWS BOB GRITZINGER: As much as I like TTs and especially ones with this baseball-glove-leather seat stitching, this looked and felt a lot like a high-end secretary's car--maybe a highly paid assistant to the undersecretary type of secretary, but a secretary nonetheless. Why? Maybe it was the cute pearl white paint, or the easy-to-drive auto-manual transmission, or the lightly weighted steering, or the overall driving ease. Add a cute baby blue roof and the package would be complete.

Maybe the paint job is what threw me, because otherwise the car--at least in Sport mode--is a hoot to drive. In regular Drive, the turbo lag is often unbearable, so keeping the revs up is imperative.

As for the comparisons with a Boxster, the only real connection is the price tag. That's huge for this car, even with the extra power, compared with the driving experience you get from a comparably priced Boxster S.

2009 Audi TTS Roadster

In Fleet: April 9-23

Base Price: $48,325

As-Tested Price: $57,125

Drivetrain: 2.0-liter turbocharged I4; AWD, six-speed sequential manual

Output: 265 hp @ 6,000 rpm, 258 lb-ft @ 2,500-5,000 rpm

Curb Weight: 3,373 lb

Fuel Economy: (EPA/AW) 24/22.0 mpg

Options: Prestige model including navigation, six-disk CD changer, interior LED lighting package, rear Audi parking system, Bose premium sound system, 10-way adjustable power seats including four-way power lumbar, heated, Bluetooth phone preparation, auto dimming interior mirror, rain sensing windshield wipers, storage package, load through facility with ski bag, power folding top ($6,000); baseball optic fine nappa leather seats ($2,000); 19-inch five parallel spoke design alloy wheels with summer tires ($800)


Source: http://www.autoweek.com/article/20091009/CARREVIEWS/910099997

10/9/09

Ohio Auto Insurance - Tips to Reduce Rates

Ohio Auto insurance
Ohio auto insurance is not compulsory in state of Ohio. You however, need to carry financial proof to show that you can meet all expenses and losses due to any accident. You can choose from three options of Ohio auto insurance to prove your financial backing.
What is Financial Responsibility?
Ohio auto insurance stipulates three ways of paying for damages and injuries in accident due to your negligence. Such proof is Financial Responsibility, which allows you to drive on Ohio roads but does not offer any protection against losses due to accidents. Financial Responsibility could be one of the following three options:
1. Have a minimum amount of liability insurance as specified by state, which is what most Ohio drivers opt for
2. Maintain $30,000 cash bond with state treasurer
3. Maintain $60,000 real estate bond with Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles
What if I do not have any Financial Responsibility?
You face severe penalties under Ohio auto insurance if you do not have any Financial Responsibility. Penalties include:
1. Confiscation of your vehicle and license plates
2. Suspension of driving license for over ninety days, which could be for a year if it is repeat offense
3. Restriction of your driving during suspension period
4. Court expenses
What is Insurance Identification Card?
Liability insurance of Ohio auto insurance helps you tide over various financial burdens in the event of any accident. Insurance company issues you card showing beginning and expiry of your liability insurance. It also offers coverage for those expenses not covered by Financial Responsibility bonds. You need to show this card if you violate any traffic rules or if asked for by any police official, although on previous occasions, you had to show this card only in court or if there was any accident.
What are the minimum coverage amounts?
Ohio auto insurance offers minimum coverage on liability insurance as bodily injuries of $12,500 for each person in an accident, $25,000 for all bodily injuries in an accident and $7,500 for property damages. It is best to have higher coverage to meet all expenses in case of any accident.
Article source: http://cognitivenet.com/archives/2009/01/25/ohio-auto-insurance-tips-to-reduce-rates/

10/8/09

2010 Volvo C70 at Frankfurt Motor Show

Volvoc70

  • Competes with: Lexus IS, Infiniti G37
  • Looks like: Volvo will be putting its new SUV design on its cars
  • Drivetrain: Turbocharged five-cylinder with 227 hp, 20/29 mpg city/highway
  • Hits dealerships: Late 2009

Volvo will debut a restyled C70 hardtop convertible at the Frankfurt Motor Show later this month, and it’s one of the more radical mid-cycle redesigns we’ve seen. The convertible incorporates the front-end design of the recently released XC60 SUV, and it does so surprisingly well. Cars that take on SUV attributes often don’t look as composed as the C70.

Around the back less is altered, but new LED taillights give the car a needed update and will likely wow potential buyers who are enamored with such things.

Inside, the materials have been updated, but there isn’t that much of a difference between the last generation’s overall design and this one. Doors, dash and the controls in the center stack all seem to be the same. However, new gauges and a new center console look to be a good upgrade.

With recent sportier competition from Infiniti and Lexus, Volvo was in dire need of this update. While the C70 likely won’t win in the performance category, it now has enough style to stay in the race. More photos below.

Source:cars.com

10/6/09

Top 10 Best-Selling Cars: August 2009

Elantra

Cash for Clunkers pushed car sales up in August, way up. Automakers like Toyota, Honda and Ford saw sales increase by 10.5%, 14.2% and 17%, respectively, but others like GM, Chrysler and Nissan couldn’t hold off losses of 20.2%, 15% and 2.9%, respectively. The automaker pecking order also changed with Nissan — including Infiniti — and Hyundai/Kia both surpassing Chrysler in terms of total sales. Chrysler is now the seventh-largest automaker in the U.S.

Which cars made the top 10 for August? Well, Cash for Clunkers led to a huge spike in sales of our usual suspects like the Toyota Camry and Honda Civic. Even the Ford F-Series had a strong month. Check out the list below to see if there were any surprises.

Top 10 Best-Sellers

  • Toyota Camry: 54,396
  • Ford F-Series: 45,590
  • Honda Civic: 43,294
  • Toyota Corolla: 43,061
  • Honda Accord: 39,726
  • Chevy Silverado: 32,421
  • Honda CR-V: 30,284
  • Nissan Altima: 26,833
  • Ford Focus: 25,547
  • Hyundai Elantra: 21,673

Porsche Cayenne Diesel: First Drive

Cayennediesel1

By Thom Blackett for Cars.com

Today’s diesel engines are equivalent to a prisoner coming up for parole. Years ago, they committed a crime against society, one with lingering effects and images not soon forgotten. After decades of banishment, they make claims of a rebirth, of adopting new ways that will benefit those on the outside. They request a second chance.

With that second chance comes conditions, and for the diesel, those include burning only ultra-low-sulfur diesel fuel, employing advanced emissions systems that drastically reduce the release of noxious exhaust particles, and making them available in all 50 states. Just to make everyone happy, toss in impressive performance and less of that annoying clanging sound that was prevalent in old diesel engines.

It would appear to be a win-win situation, but truth be told, this new generation like the Volkswagen Jetta TDI and BMW X5 xDrive35d are enjoying only mixed results. That’s why Porsche is reluctant to offer U.S. buyers access to its Cayenne Diesel, a new model that constitutes the vast majority of Cayenne sales in Europe. From the outside, there’s not the slightest indication that you’re looking at something other than a gas-powered Cayenne, but packed under the hood is a turbocharged 3.0-liter V-6 diesel good for 240 horsepower and, like the 2011 Cayenne S Hybrid, 406 pounds-feet of torque. Porsche claims a combined fuel economy rating of roughly 25 mpg. While not required in Europe, a U.S.-spec model would feature the same urea-based AdBlue system used in existing large diesels like the Volkswagen Touareg 2 TDI. Smaller diesels like the Jetta don’t require an additive to pass U.S. emissions.

As with the Hybrid variant, we took advantage of Porsche’s offer to drive the Cayenne Diesel around a short loop in Los Angeles. What we discovered, aside from the lack of diesel clatter, was a heavy SUV that delivered tremendous torque, yet didn’t feel all that quick. Plant the accelerator against the floorboard from a dead stop and you’ll notice some definite turbo lag; rolling on the gas pedal elicited a quicker response. The V-6 is mated to a Tiptronic S six-speed automatic transmission that’s been specifically programmed for the diesel’s torque curve.

In comparison with the Hybrid’s electrohydraulic steering, we expected the Cayenne Diesel’s power-assisted rack-and-pinion unit to provide superior road feel and quicker, more linear feedback. To the contrary, the Diesel’s steering felt too light and disconnected from the road. From a handling perspective, we continue to be less enamored with the Porsche of SUVs than rivals from BMW and even Acura regardless of whether they have gas, diesel or hybrid powertrains.

Of course, that will remain a moot point until Porsche decides if and when it will make a Cayenne Diesel available to consumers in the U.S. (even the example we drove was destined for a return trip to Germany). For now, models from BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen will be left to demonstrate that today’s diesels are efficient, powerful and clean rides deserving of a second look.

Specifications

  • Engine: Turbocharged 3.0-liter V-6 diesel
  • Horsepower: 240 hp
  • Torque: 406 lbs.-ft.
  • Transmission: Six-speed automatic
  • Fuel Economy: 25.3 mpg combined (Porsche estimate)
  • 0-62 mph: 8.3 seconds (Porsche estimate)
  • Top Speed: 133 mph (Porsche estimate)
  • Competitors: BMW X5 xDrive35d, Cadillac Escalade Hybrid, Lexus RX 450h, Volkswagen Touareg 2 TDI
Source: http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2009/09/porsche-cayenne-diesel-first-drive.html

10/5/09

Cheapest Auto Insurance: Tested Tips To Get It

by Chimezirim Odimba
Currently, there are countless techniques to help a vehicle owner in getting the cheapest auto insurance. Discovering this sort of car insurance is reliant on the safety measures of the automobile, the driver, and the number of miles that the vehicle will be engaged in.
Once a driver has demonstrated that they can drive with no traffic breaches and speeding tickets, the likelihood of cheap auto insurance is more possible. Insurance companies are incredibly cautious to suggest cheap auto insurance.
In advance of buying any vehicle insurance, you will have to to compare prices if you would like to uncover cheap auto insurance prices. By means of the Internet, you can find the most excellent insurance prices in a less amount of time.
Further issues that have an effect on your insurance premiums are the location of your car during the night, the protection features in your vehicle, and your driving history, the length of time driving and in addition age and gender. People can get a more affordable insurance packages when they bulk buy insurance for all their needs.
People must request if a multi-vehicle price cut will be an option if you use this one insurance company to meet all of your needs. The reductions will certainly be relevant if you insure your house, life or any other insurance needs with one insurance company.
Everybody requests a cheap auto insurance company, but what nearly everyone disregards is the worth of it. It is significant to create a cheap auto insurance policy, and with a company that will furnish reliable consumer service.
Perhaps you have a friend or family member that is getting cheap auto insurance from a certain insurance company. Nevertheless, you phoned to receive your price quote and it was disgracefully costly.
Many don’t realize that although a driver is getting the best rates from one auto insurance company, it can also be the most expensive insurance company for you. Because of this, it is essential to get more than a few car insurance quotes from several agencies.
Article source: http://ultimatecarguideonline.com/cheapest-auto-insurance-tested-tips-to-get-it/

10/4/09

5 Tips Choosing Auto Insurance Rates

Some companies are taking advantage of unsuspecting customers. Its main objective is to as much as possible. This also applies to the insurance industry. So, as you know, and what steps you can take to ensure that they do not fall into the wrong hands? This article answers these questions ...

1. All states have an arm that is responsible for the safe and there are always buyers forall insurance companies in the state. You can a lot about the insurance, valuable advice, insurance companies have such insurance in the state and other useful information. The more you understand what to do in auto insurance, better prices.

2. Ask those around you about your insurance. What was the quality of service that were previously used and what are your experiences with your current agent or insurance? You may be asked for your agent if they Raving reviews of their performance. However, make sure you do not just ask a friend, and then, their agent (Not that you are, how good are these players). . Request bids from each. A lot of time with each of them, the note of the answer, this is the best value. Although this method is very effective, there will be a little time.

3. If the buying process much more effectively by using consumer guides. You get the typical rates of auto insurance. There are also tips for you to substantial savings without compromising the quality of coverage you get. Despite the show with the best deals, the figures are usually estimates or for a specific profile. Shop Right, offers at least three agents. More dates will increase the chances that you better prices and value.

4. Motor insurance is a policy that really needs with an insurance company, which is a good track record. It is not to solve, such as a company that you undertake.Different companies have different approaches to business. They determine their future. You need to find out how insurance companies handled claims. So take your time to talk with your department for the insurance of the states, the Better Business Bureau, AM Best Company, Phelps, Inc., Standard & Poor's Insurance Rating Services, Moody's Investor Services, Inc., and to ensure , which are in good hands.

5. Take time to visit a minimum of 3 offers from sites that offer insurance in car insurance. This requires no more than 15 minutes. When you visit each page, make sure the same information. Anything else is misleading quotes. Upon receipt of your auto insurance rates, compare them to see which best serves the interest in the prize value.

Article source: http://modemdriver.blogspot.com/2009/02/5-tips-choosing-auto-insurance-rates.html

Mazda 3 MPS vs Ford Focus RS

Can Mazda’s red-hot new Mazda 3 MPS beat Ford’s barnstorming Focus RS? We put them head-to-head for a duel to remember.

The arrival of the Focus RS has made 2009 a year to remember for fast Ford fans. After countless near misses and false dawns, the blue oval finally delivered a car worthy of the famous RS badge in July. Bold and brash, it careered into the hot hatch market like a bull in the proverbial china shop.

The most powerful front-wheel-drive car on the market, the Focus offers rally-inspired looks and performance that have already won over fans, ensuring it a place in the fast Ford hall of fame.

But as is often the case in this fiercely competitive sector, it hasn’t had to wait long for an exciting new rival to appear on the horizon. The latest Mazda 3 MPS is built on the same platform as the Focus RS, but in terms of design philosophy it’s a very different proposition.

Powered by a 256bhp four cylinder turbocharged engine, the five-door Mazda is aiming to steal the RS’s limelight with its rapid performance, practical cabin and sizeable £4,895 price advantage.

Seeing off the flagship Focus won’t be an easy task – the RS has already beaten the Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X – but given the Mazda’s specification and value for money, it certainly has the firepower to cause an upset.

Will the subtlety and guile of the MPS outwit the thunderous RS?

There’s only one way to find out… so we brought them face to face in a keenly anticipated battle of the superhatches!

Source: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/grouptests/242902/mazda_3_mps_vs_ford_focus_rs.html#ixzz0TiOJz2X3

9/25/09

What recession? Hyundai Canada's already surpassed its annual sales record

Hyundai Despite the economic turmoil, Hyundai Auto Canada’s been breaking sales records throughout 2009. In fact, this September was its best in history, a result which has pushed the brand passed its annual sales record three months early.

The ’09 sales top last year’s by about 2.5 percent, at 82,642 vehicles currently. September was the Korean automaker’s eighth straight record-breaking month and ninth consecutive month of sales increases. The Santa Fe sport ute’s been a stand out. Each month this year has been the model’s best ever - 2,478 were sold in September alone.

Last year, during its 25th anniversary in Canada, Hyundai broke its old sales record set back in 1985, when the Pony commanded 64 percent of its volume.

“We’ve come a long way since we started doing business in Canada,” said Steve Kelleher, president and CEO, Hyundai Auto Canada Corp. “Today, we’re on consumers’ radar because people are getting to know us for who we truly are: a hugely successful auto company with a fuel-efficient and award-winning line-up that offers smart value to customers”

It may come as surprise that, ranked globally, Hyundai is now the fourth largest automaker (behind Toyota, GM and Volkswagen), Hyundai is Canada’s sixth largest manufacturer by volume as of end-of-August figures.
Source: carguidecanada.ca

9/18/09

Auto Insurance Tips – Sealing the Deal on Affordable Car Insurance

By Krista M. FarmerOkay.

I admit it. I’ll stand in line for the latest Harry Potter book. You can probably convince me that I “need” the latest Dior volumizing mascara and yes, I have eaten turtle cheesecake for supper before. I have several guilty pleasures. Buying auto insurance is not one of them, but it’s a necessity. Read on to learn why, in addition to being a legal stipulation, auto insurance is important to you and your assets.First things first – While penalties vary state to state, you can guarantee that driving without coverage will take some clank out of your bank. Uninsured drivers can face a myriad of punishments for merely being stopped and not being able to prove coverage. This fact alone should be enough to convince you to start researching reasonable insurance coverages for your vehicle.Not persuasive enough? Consider your possible liability in the event of an accident…Your vehicle collides with Mrs. Baker’s vehicle. Mrs. Baker is a fourth grade teacher at the local elementary school and is now facing $80,000 in medical bills, $65,000 in lost wages and is requesting $200,000 for pain and suffering. That’s a $345,000 claim that, unless you have adequate coverage for, you will be pulling out of your pocket. Certainly in this case, as the too familiar adage wisely states, it’s better to be safe than sorry.So, you know you need auto insurance. While it’s not sinfully delicious or nearly as enjoyable as turtle cheesecake, lack of adequate coverage will definitely leave you with a bellyache in the event of an automobile accident. It is possible to find insurance you can afford.Remember! Your car insurance rate is based on your insurance risk assessment. If an insurance company determines you are a high-risk driver, your monthly cost will be higher than that of the average driver. You CAN remedy this! Let’s take a look at a few things you can do to reduce your auto insurance risk which, in turn, could lessen your auto insurance cost…1) Purchase home/renter’s insurance from the same carrier as your auto insurance. Some insurance companies offer multi-policy discounts.2) Always obey traffic laws, specifically the speed limit. Insurance companies take note of your driving record. More speeding tickets = higher risk driver = increased auto insurance cost.Other things to keep in mind…1) To the insurance company, plain and simple, you are a set of risks. Anything you can do to decrease your “risk factor” might affect your cost of coverage.2) Always ask for discounts. Many insurance companies offer deals for safe drivers. If you’re considered less of a risk, they’ll likely reward you.3) Always comparison shop. You can always find a bargain if you know where to look. Insurance is such a commodity. Comparison sites like http://www.hometownquotes.com can help you shop for affordable insurance.You can always eat too much cheesecake. You may get tired of Harry, Hermione and Ron. And that tube of Dior mascara will eventually get clumpy. Your auto insurance, however, is one purchase that you should never regret or feel guilty about. It will only cushion you in the end. Are you covered?*Please note that this article is not a professional consultation. This article is for general information only. Always seek specific information from a licensed insurance professional.*
Article source: http://ukinsurances.blogspot.com/2008/12/auto-insurance-tips-sealing-deal-on_20.html

9/11/09

Hey! Welcome to my blog

Hi everyone.
I am Bon ( DL ). I’ve decided to start writing a regular blog on blogspot.com to share some of the things I’ve learned over the years. I hope you enjoy my blog. :)